Equiano's Argument on Slavery
Our discussion from class was very eye opening for me because the different ideas presented in class developed my understanding of Equiano’s argument/feelings of slavery. Equiano has a very passive tone in his work and it seems like he doesn't want to anger anyone with his opinions in slavery. He does make comments regarding the issue and makes comments regarding treating slaves better, but he does not choose one side or the other. As one of my classmates stated, he may have chosen this stance because the list of subscribers contained people that were powerful and they had slaves. Equiano definitely had opinions on slavery and how slaves were treated, but he also did not want to ruffle any feathers which is why he could not pick a side and anger a certain group. He mentioned that if you treat your slaves better, they will work better, but he also does not mention completely abolishing slavery. As I was reading, I was a bit confused because of the slight contradictions he presents regarding his opinions on slavery, but I now understand why he did not choose a specific side. Equiano is making the practical/economic argument as he does not want to be seen as the bad guy and he obviously wants his book to sell, getting a large amount of good reviews. He does speak about his miserable experiences with slavery and he states,” My former slavery now rose in dreadful review to my mind, and displayed nothing but misery, stripes, and chains…(Equiano 115). Again, Equiano does not blatantly state that slavery is bad, but he speaks of his own bad experiences with slavery.
I agree with you that although Equiano may have supported abolition of slavery, he doesn't specifically mention it in order to make his narrative more palatable to a wide audience. I think that this fact is really important to understanding what details Equiano chooses to include as well as how he frames those details.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree in that Equiano is taking a more passive voice when it comes to pointing the blame of slavery. He knows that people will not be so willing to abolish slavery if they feel attacked by this argument. So in order to circumvent this issue, Equiano never directly points the blame of slavery on anyone specific group and therefor allows his intended audience to empathize with the harsh realities of slavery.
ReplyDeleteYeah, I definitely agree that Equiano is purposefully avoiding placing blame for slavery. Attacking one's character generally leads people to be unreceptive towards discourse, so imagine how much more this would hold true for literal slave-owners. His more logical approach to criticizing the shortcomings and inefficiencies of slavery allows Equiano to actually connect with his audience.
DeleteI think, as you touched on, he really just wanted to share his story. The purpose behind that, though undefined, is not necessary to absorb the tragedy of slavery that we see through Equiano.
ReplyDelete